Monthly Archives: February 2012

lectureNotes_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Messiaen, Quartet for the End of Time, Mov’t 1 – Isorhythm

We’re using Quatuor pour la fin du temps (Quartet for the End of Time) 1940 – 41, by Olivier Messiaen (1908 – 1992), as the basis for several concepts introduced in chapter 6 (Rhythm and Meter). This post will focus on the first movement, “Liturgie de Cristal,” as an example of isorhythm.

You may have studied isorhythm in the context of 14th- and 15th-century music – notably, isorhythmic motets. You can also find isorhythmic procedures in other 20th- and 21st-century composers, and in the music of India. An isorhythm features a repeating rhythmic pattern and an independent repeating pitch pattern. Messiaen referred to the repeating rhythmic pattern as a rhythmic pedal.

The cello and piano both feature independent isorhythms. The cello has the shortest repeating pitch pattern (5 pitches), along with a 15-duration rhythmic pattern. The pitch pattern in the cello is C4, E-natural4, D4, F#4, Bb3. The rhythmic pattern is substantially longer at 15 note values, but having the rhythmic pattern be a whole-number multiple of the pitch pattern means that the rhythmic pattern will always start with the beginning of the pitch pattern. The rhythmic pattern lasting for a total duration of 16.5 beats, the pattern will alternate starting off the beat, and on the beat.

The piano isorhythm is less synchronized than the one in the cello, and it has a longer pitch pattern than rhythmic pattern. The rhythmic pattern is 17 note values in length, starting with the three quarter notes in succession, and the duration of the entire pattern is 13 beats. The pattern always starts on the beat but in different part of the measure each time. The pitch pattern is comprised of 29 chords. The number of chords in the pitch pattern and the number of rhythmic values in its pattern are both prime numbers. These two patterns will not start together for 17 x 29 repetitions (493), which is much longer than the duration of the movement. This lack of synchronization, along with the lack of synchronization between the two isorhythms, contributes to a static feeling for the movement, and a feeling of incompleteness.

To sum up the two isorhythms:

  • cello: 5 pitches, 15 rhythmic values, total duration of 16.5 beats.
  • piano: 29 chords, 17 rhythmic values, total duration of 13 beats.

The violin and the clarinet both have the performance indication of “comme un oiseau” (like a bird). These two instruments are providing music that resembles bird calls. Along with Messiaen’s devout Catholicism, he was greatly influenced by the music of birds, going as far as transcribing their calls and incorporating them into his works.

computerMusic3 lectureNotes_cm3

(maxmsp) chiptune demo patcher for 2/24 in-class work

Mr. Olson has prepared a wondrous chiptune demo patcher for 2/24. Download and prepare to amaze and be amazed.

assignments_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Rhythm and Meter Assignment Number 2

Due Monday, 2/27/12.

Exercises from Chapter 6 of the Kostka (pp. 122 – 124):

  • Part A, 3 and 4
  • Part B, 1 – 5

For the questions about polytempo in Part A, the equation and explanations from the tempo modulation post will be all you need to solve for all the tempi in question 3. For question 4, the wording is a little confusing. Here are some hints:

  • 4a: first find the quarter note tempo of half = 96. Then treat the triplet eighth and the sixteenth note as the same rhythmic value (they equal each other from old to new). The new tempo will be slower than the old quarter note tempo (but faster than the old half note tempo).
  • 4b: focus on the common denominator rhythmic value between the dotted half note and the half note tied to an eighth note. If you plug and chug you are likely to end up with a faster tempo, but realize that if the new shorter duration equals the old longer duration, then the tempo is slowing down.** Adjust your ratio accordingly; the answer is a whole number, and slower than the original tempo.
  • 4c: the same is true of this ratio. What used to take x units now takes x+1. The new tempo is slower than the previous tempo.**

**Consider a two simple examples:

  • The tempo is quarter = 120.
  • To change to the new tempo, an old eighth note now equals a triplet eighth note. It used to take two subdivisions to complete one beat, but now it takes three subdivisions of the same length to complete one beat. Therefore, the tempo is slowing down.
  • 120(2/3) = 80. The old grouping was two (eighth notes); the new grouping is three (triplet eighth notes, that are the same duration as the old eighth note).
  • The tempo is quarter = 120.
  • The old half note equals the new quarter note. The old grouping is four eighth notes and the new grouping is two eighth notes, but the eighth notes are note equal across tempi. What took two beats now takes one beat, which is twice as long as the old beat 120(1/2)=60. Remember, if the old duration is equal to a new duration of shorter rhythmic value, then the tempo is slowing down. Adjust your ratio accordingly.
lectureNotes_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Tempo Modulation and Polytempo

Last year’s post walks you through the basics. Look it over and make sure you understand the formula and how to use it for both tempo modulation (metric modulation to some) and polytempo. Just to include it here and reiterate:

The formula can be stated in a simple, easy to remember way:

original_tempo * (original_grouping_number / new_grouping_number) = new_tempo

For the ratio to work, the rhythmic value of both the original and new groupings must be the same. In other words, compare groupings of sixteenth notes to sixteenth notes, eighth notes to eighth notes, etc.

If you are trying to solve for polytempi, you will always compare to subdivisions of the stated reference tempo (the given metronome marking). You can always subdivide the reference tempo into the necessary rhythmic subdivisions to compare to the other tempi. In the Carter String Quartet No. 1, the reference tempo is for the quarter note in the cello part. The quarter note can be divided into sixteenth notes to compare to the second violin, into triplet eighths to compare to the first violin, etc.

If you are ever confused about which grouping goes first in the ratio, consider whether you are speeding up or slowing down. If you are speeding up, the smaller number will come second, making the ratio greater than one and increasing the original tempo via multiplication. If you are slowing down, the smaller number will be first, making the ratio smaller than one and decreasing the original tempo via multiplication.

lectureNotes_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Rhythm and Meter in Post-Tonal Music

I want to include a chapter 6 clean-up to make sure all are clear about the major concepts. This post from last year summarizes the topics very briefly, except for polytempo and tempo modulation.

computerMusic3 lectureNotes_cm3

(maxmsp) Simple Additive Synth, patcher aesthetics…

I’ve uploaded a much-improved version of my simple additive synthesizer (2 oscillators). The patcher makes extensive use of send and receive objects, which function to both clean up the spaghetti tangle of patch cords, and provide a means for self-commenting code.

The core of the patcher is a two-oscillator additive synth, with function controls for amplitude envelopes.

MIDI input and other user interface controls, aside from the function editors, are located at the top of the patcher. A MIDI keyboard is used to supply the pitch (as a MIDI note number later converted to a frequency in Hz), and to trigger the attack and release sections of the envelopes. Note numbers from noteon messages are sent via stripnote to the s noteNumber object. noteNumber is received by both oscillator patches. Stripnote also passes the noteon velocity, which is sent to each function editor via s noteOn and used to bang (start) the function. Since each function editor makes use of a sustain point (indicated by the white halo around the dot), a next message is needed to move to the release portion of the envelope. All incoming velocities are sent from notein to the select object. Noteoff velocities of 0 are selected, and the resulting bang is sent via s noteOff to each function editor to trigger a next message. Notice how the send and receive objects are self-commenting the patcher? Since you have to label a send/receive destination, you can use a label that indicates what is being sent. I’ve color-coded all the send/receive objects so you can easily find the connections.

The ratio (multiplier) for the second oscillator frequency can be set with a float, sent via s partialRatio. Overall partial amplitude is addressed similarly via partialAmp. To the far right of the top portion there is also an input to set the overall time length of the function editors (via adrLength). Since the sustain will last as long as you hold down a key, this length only really applies to the attack, initial decay, and release times. The integer is sent to the setdomain $1 message, and the whole message is sent to each function editor.

There are two continuous controllers being used to set the detune amount, and the portamento time (portTime). The top integer of this portion can be used to tell ctlin to listen to a different controller number (119 and 120 work with my nanoKontrol). The cc input is scaled to an appropriate range (0. – 1. for detune, meaning a max of one half step; 0. – 1000. for portamento in ms), and then sent.

The first oscillator is very straightforward. noteNumber is converted from MIDI to frequency (Hz), packed with the current portamento time, and the message is sent on to line~ and eventually to the frequency input of a saw~. The function editor receives noteOn, noteOff, and adrLength messages. Its output is pairs of numbers in line~ format, sent to a line~, and then on to a *~ to control amplitude.

The second oscillator has the exact same function editor controls, but is more involved with regards to frequency. noteNumber and detune are added together and eventually sent to mtof. mtof can convert fractional MIDI note numbers to the appropriate microtune frequency. The detune amount is added to the note number, and the bang message is triggers the + operation when ever the detune amount changes. This allows you to update the partial frequency with detune information even while holding a note.

The detuned frequency is then sent to a multiplication object to be multiplied by the partial ratio. From there, the rest of the patcher is similar until you get to the extra *~ object for scaling the overall partial amplitude (since partials usually have less amplitude than fundamentals).

The output of both scaled saw~ objects are sent via an audio send object (send~) to the same receive~ destination, and then to gain~ object and ezdac~. It’s important to note that audio send~ and receive~ objects must be spelled out in full, not abbreviated as s~ and r~.

assignments_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Assignment: Bartok Syncopation

Due Monday, 2/18/12:

Indicate the perceived additive groupings in Bartok’s Mikrokosmos, #133, “Syncopation.”

On a copy of the score, write a triangle above the score for groupings of 3 eighth notes, and a square U for groupings of 2 eighth notes. If you encounter groupings of 4 eighth notes, treat it as 2 groups of 2 eighth notes.

As the piece progresses, the groupings go across bar lines. Always write what you perceive. Do not let the notated bar lines affect your grouping decisions.

lectureNotes_musth4 musicTheory4

(musTh 212) Rhythm and Meter: Bartok, Additive Meter and Syncopation

Friday we covered two Bartok Mikrokosmos pieces: No. 115, Bulgarian Rhythm; and No. 133, Syncopation.

Additive Rhythm and Additive Meter (“Bulgarian Rhythm”)

Bulgarian Rhythm is an example of additive meter. The 5/8 meter is expresses as both (3+2)/8 and (2+3)/8. Additive rhythm is related to some folk rhythmic practices (African drumming, for example), where there is a basic pulse that is never subdivided, so all rhythms are some multiple of the basic pulse. Additive meter takes this idea and organizes it into a meter with strong and weak beats.

Additive meters will always have unequal beat lengths. As an example, consider the difference between 4/4 and 8/8. Both meters have the same number of eighth notes, but 8/8 specifically implies that the eighth notes will be grouped into beats of 3+3+2 eighth notes (or some order of 3, 3, and 2), instead of 2+2+2+2.

Bulgarian Rhythm uses meter as one an organizing aspect of form. The piece is basically an ABA, with a short coda. The A and A’ section (mm. 1 – 8; x – x) uses a 3+2 additive groupings, while the B section switches to 2+3 groupings. The final two phrases comprise a coda or closing section, where a measure with 5 eighth notes in 3+2 grouping is followed by a measure with quarter note followed by dotted quarter note (2+3 grouping). The coda combines the additive grouping patterns from both sections.

We also talked about the tonal organization (pitch centricity), how it was established, and how it corresponded to the sections.

Syncopation (“Syncopation”)

Syncopation as a concept involves accenting weak parts of any meter, which could mean accenting off the beat, or accenting weak beats within a measure. Accents can be either dynamic or agogic (time-based, duration).

The Bartok Syncopation uses rhythmic accents to create additive grouping that differ from the notated meters. The result of these groupings are perceived meters: audible groupings that we hear as metrically organized. The opening 5/4 measure is grouped into perceivable 10/8 meter, (3+3+2+2)/8. What the listener hears is very similar in effect to Bulgarian Rhythm.

The frequently changing time signatures – often a change every measure – are another characteristic of post-tonal music.

assignments_musth4 musicTheory4

(musth 212) Listen/Look Assignment: Messiaen, Carter, and Ligeti

For Monday, 2/18/12:

Finish reading chapter 6 in the textbook, including the section on polymeter and tempo modulation.

Listen (with the score) to

  • Olivier Messiaen, Quatuor pour la fin du temps, Liturgie de Cristal (pp. 544 – 550). (Quartet for the End of Time) Also listen to the Mov’t VI, Dance of the Furies of the Seven Trumpets. I’ll bring a score to class to look at.
  • Györgi Ligeti, Galamb Borong, from Etudes for Piano, Book II (pp. 567 – 574). Notice the rhythmic inconsistencies for the notation of any value longer than a sixteenth. Also pay attention to the rhythmic alignment of the melodic parts emphasized in the two hands (right hand is the top staff; left had covers the lower two staves).
  • And if you have time, Elliott Carter, Canaries, No. 7 from Eight Pieces for Four Timpani (pp. 551 – 553). We won’t get to this piece until Wednesday.
assignments_musth4 musicTheory4

(musth 212) Reading, Listening, and Score Study Assignment – Rhythm

Continuing on from our testing extravaganza, I want to focus class time more on understanding theoretical concepts through the study of works. I’m trusting all of you can read the text and follow those examples. I hope that we can make class time a bit more interesting (and relevant) by focusing on understanding how concepts play out musically.

Towards that end, read chapter 6 in the Kostka on your own before Friday. You can skip over the part about tempo modulation and polytempo for Friday, but we will get to those parts later. Take notes.

Pieces to study and listen to for Friday (2/17/12):

  • Bartok: Mikrokosmos No. 115 (Bulgarian Rhythm) and No. 133 (Syncopation)
  • Messiaen: Quatuor pour la fin du temps (Quarter for the End of Time), Mov’t I, Liturgy of the Crystal

All works are in your anthology. You should listen to all works as well. Subsequent tests will have much more emphasis on works we’ve covered in class.